This paper contains 3D/2D/1D ground response analyses of Norcia basin during the M6.5 2016 October 30 event by comparing the recorded response at NOR and NRC stations, which are located in mid-basin and near-fault conditions. Results show that 3D simulations may capture the overall response reasonably well, yet the simplification of vertical incidence seems to bias the results due to the presence of complex near-fault seismic wave propagation effects.

On the comparison of 3D, 2D, and 1D numerical approaches to predict seismic site amplification: the case of Norcia basin during the M6.5 2016 October 30 earthquake.

Zuccolo E.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

This paper contains 3D/2D/1D ground response analyses of Norcia basin during the M6.5 2016 October 30 event by comparing the recorded response at NOR and NRC stations, which are located in mid-basin and near-fault conditions. Results show that 3D simulations may capture the overall response reasonably well, yet the simplification of vertical incidence seems to bias the results due to the presence of complex near-fault seismic wave propagation effects.
2019
9780429031274
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Barreto_et_al_2019_Submitted.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 386.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
386.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/27246
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact