Vibroseis is a source used commonly for inland seismic exploration. This non-destructive source is often usedin urban areas with strong environmental noise. The main goal of seismic data processing is to increase thesignal/noise ratio where a determinant step is deconvolution. Vibroseis seismic data do not meet the basicminimum-phase assumption for the application of spiking and predictive deconvolution, therefore varioustechniques, such as phase shift, are applied to the data, to be able to successfully perform deconvolution ofvibroseis data.This work analyzes the application of deconvolution techniques before and after cross-correlation on a real dataset acquired for high resolution prospection of deep aquifers. In particular, we compare pre-correlation spikingand predictive deconvolution with Wiener filtering and with post-correlation time variant spectral whiteningdeconvolution. The main result is that at small offsets, post cross-correlation spectral whitening deconvolutionand pre-correlation spiking deconvolution yield comparable results, while for large offsets the best result isobtained by applying a pre-cross-correlation predictive deconvolution.

Vibroseis deconvolution: A comparison of pre and post correlation vibroseis deconvolution data in real noisy data

Baradello L
;
Accaino F
2013-01-01

Abstract

Vibroseis is a source used commonly for inland seismic exploration. This non-destructive source is often usedin urban areas with strong environmental noise. The main goal of seismic data processing is to increase thesignal/noise ratio where a determinant step is deconvolution. Vibroseis seismic data do not meet the basicminimum-phase assumption for the application of spiking and predictive deconvolution, therefore varioustechniques, such as phase shift, are applied to the data, to be able to successfully perform deconvolution ofvibroseis data.This work analyzes the application of deconvolution techniques before and after cross-correlation on a real dataset acquired for high resolution prospection of deep aquifers. In particular, we compare pre-correlation spikingand predictive deconvolution with Wiener filtering and with post-correlation time variant spectral whiteningdeconvolution. The main result is that at small offsets, post cross-correlation spectral whitening deconvolutionand pre-correlation spiking deconvolution yield comparable results, while for large offsets the best result isobtained by applying a pre-cross-correlation predictive deconvolution.
2013
Data processing, Vibroseis deconvolution, uncorrelated data
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
baradello3.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 3.26 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.26 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/1108
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact