Seismic hazard in Central Italy due to the 2016-2017 seismic sequence is modeled using a standard probabilistic aftershock seismic hazard model. Two key features of the model are the consideration of time-dependent aftershock occurrence, modeled by stacking Omori decay curves associated with the three largest (M-w > 5.5) events, and the incorporation of geologic information by modeling the locations of expected seismicity along realistic fault surfaces. The computed seismic hazard at Amatrice indicates higher hazard values compared to those computed using a conventional time-independent hazard analysis. We then compare the computed hazard curves against empirical hazard curves constructed for 12 individual recording stations in terms of peak ground acceleration, each with at least 35 (and up to 231) recordings. At eight sites, the observed exceedances fall within one standard deviation of the expected mean, while at the remaining sites, the observed exceedances fall outside this range indicating a poorer match. The soil sites are among the stations with the poorest match, suggesting that site effects may not be accurately modeled with the current approach.

The power of the little ones: Computed and observed aftershock hazard in Central Italy

Peruzza L.
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Seismic hazard in Central Italy due to the 2016-2017 seismic sequence is modeled using a standard probabilistic aftershock seismic hazard model. Two key features of the model are the consideration of time-dependent aftershock occurrence, modeled by stacking Omori decay curves associated with the three largest (M-w > 5.5) events, and the incorporation of geologic information by modeling the locations of expected seismicity along realistic fault surfaces. The computed seismic hazard at Amatrice indicates higher hazard values compared to those computed using a conventional time-independent hazard analysis. We then compare the computed hazard curves against empirical hazard curves constructed for 12 individual recording stations in terms of peak ground acceleration, each with at least 35 (and up to 231) recordings. At eight sites, the observed exceedances fall within one standard deviation of the expected mean, while at the remaining sites, the observed exceedances fall outside this range indicating a poorer match. The soil sites are among the stations with the poorest match, suggesting that site effects may not be accurately modeled with the current approach.
2022
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis
aftershocks
central Italy
data model comparison
Omori
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021_gee_eqs.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 5.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.29 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/16043
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact