Effects assessment – based on the sensitivity of particular species, communities or habitats linked to potential leakage events associated with identified risks. Where relevant it shall include effects of exposure to elevated CO2 concentrations in the biosphere (including soils, marine sediments and benthic waters (asphyxiation; hypercapnia) and reduced pH in those environments as a consequence of leaking CO2).. There are limitations in regard to quantitative approaches as follows: Research on quantification of leakage pathways and flux rates is still ongoing, and therefore these assessments are likely to be of qualitative/semi-quantitative nature, until experienced is gained. Further research studies are underway, with an aim to provide more quantitative approaches/data for such assessments. See, for example, 'IEAGHG Quantification Techniques for CO2 Leakage' study and the EU FP7 RISCS project. It is recognised that current imaging technologies should be further developed to identify the existence of all relevant risks, as the scale of some risks could be less than existing surveying detection limits. Judging the likelihood and consequence of risk elements, or the associated uncertainties, both qualitatively or (semi- )quantitatively, depends in part on the reliability of the input parameters. Care should be taken that a valid body of data and experience exists for justifying the application of quantitative analysis to risk elements affecting the geological storage of CO2. (European Commission Guidance Document 1 Excerpts, pages 39-40)

Final Report Summary of the European Union Project Research into Impacts and Safety in CO2 Storage: Final OGS-DOGA Oceanographic Results

Pacciaroni M.
Software
;
Crispi G.
Supervision
;
2011-01-01

Abstract

Effects assessment – based on the sensitivity of particular species, communities or habitats linked to potential leakage events associated with identified risks. Where relevant it shall include effects of exposure to elevated CO2 concentrations in the biosphere (including soils, marine sediments and benthic waters (asphyxiation; hypercapnia) and reduced pH in those environments as a consequence of leaking CO2).. There are limitations in regard to quantitative approaches as follows: Research on quantification of leakage pathways and flux rates is still ongoing, and therefore these assessments are likely to be of qualitative/semi-quantitative nature, until experienced is gained. Further research studies are underway, with an aim to provide more quantitative approaches/data for such assessments. See, for example, 'IEAGHG Quantification Techniques for CO2 Leakage' study and the EU FP7 RISCS project. It is recognised that current imaging technologies should be further developed to identify the existence of all relevant risks, as the scale of some risks could be less than existing surveying detection limits. Judging the likelihood and consequence of risk elements, or the associated uncertainties, both qualitatively or (semi- )quantitatively, depends in part on the reliability of the input parameters. Care should be taken that a valid body of data and experience exists for justifying the application of quantitative analysis to risk elements affecting the geological storage of CO2. (European Commission Guidance Document 1 Excerpts, pages 39-40)
2011
978-92-79-19833-5
Consideration was given to possible impacts on groundwater resources and on near surface ecosystems both onshore and offshore - Spin-off and Model 1), The baseline (most likely) scenario in each case was that of the evolution of the system with no leakage of CO2 - Workshop 5), Potential impacts from leakage were examined through field and laboratory experiments and through observations at sites where natural CO2 seepage is occurring either into groundwaters or marine or terrestrial surface environments. Experimental design and the wider implications of leakage were also studied through modelling of both onshore and offshore systems - 1D Model 4), The results indicate that leakage most commonly occurs over small areas (metres to tens of metres across) and that dispersion can be rapid in both the atmosphere and in sea water or groundwater - Scenario 3), The latter would be greatly assisted by good baselines and by monitoring parameters other than those directly indicative of CO2 such as temperature and dissolved oxygen offshore oxygen nitrogen and isotopes in soil gas - Dataset 2) (Excerpts from the Executive summary of the Final Report by BGS Co-ordinator D. G. Jones in the European Union CORDIS URL)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
trondheim.pdf

Open Access dal 16/07/2020

Descrizione: Powerpoint presented at the Third Annual Workshop of European Union Project Reseach into Impacts and Safety in CO2 Storage held in Trondheim, Norway, 6-8 November 2012: License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. (Presentation Excerpts)
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 559.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
559.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/22703
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact