Understanding mechanical processes occurring on faults requires detailed information on the microseismicity that can be enhanced today by advanced techniques for earthquake detection. This problem is challenging when the seismicity rate is low and most of the earthquakes occur at depth. In this study, we compare three detection techniques, the autocorrelation FAST, the machine learning EQTransformer, and the template matching EQCorrScan, to assess their ability to improve catalogues associated with seismic sequences in the normal fault system of Southern Apennines (Italy) using data from the Irpinia Near Fault Observatory (INFO). We found that the integration of the machine learning and template matching detectors, the former providing templates for the cross-correlation, largely outperforms techniques based on autocorrelation and machine learning alone, featuring an enrichment of the automatic and manual catalogues of factors 21 and 7, respectively. Since output catalogues can be polluted by many false positives, we applied refined event selection based on the cumulative distribution of their similarity level. We can thus clean up the detection lists and analyse final subsets dominated by real events. The magnitude of completeness decreases by more than one unit compared to the reference value for the network. We report b-values associated with sequences smaller than the average, likely corresponding to larger differential stresses than for the background seismicity of the area. For all the analysed sequences, we found that main events are anticipated by foreshocks, indicating a possible preparation process for main shocks at subkilometric scales.

Comparing and integrating artificial intelligence and similarity search detection techniques: application to seismic sequences in Southern Italy

Picozzi M.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Understanding mechanical processes occurring on faults requires detailed information on the microseismicity that can be enhanced today by advanced techniques for earthquake detection. This problem is challenging when the seismicity rate is low and most of the earthquakes occur at depth. In this study, we compare three detection techniques, the autocorrelation FAST, the machine learning EQTransformer, and the template matching EQCorrScan, to assess their ability to improve catalogues associated with seismic sequences in the normal fault system of Southern Apennines (Italy) using data from the Irpinia Near Fault Observatory (INFO). We found that the integration of the machine learning and template matching detectors, the former providing templates for the cross-correlation, largely outperforms techniques based on autocorrelation and machine learning alone, featuring an enrichment of the automatic and manual catalogues of factors 21 and 7, respectively. Since output catalogues can be polluted by many false positives, we applied refined event selection based on the cumulative distribution of their similarity level. We can thus clean up the detection lists and analyse final subsets dominated by real events. The magnitude of completeness decreases by more than one unit compared to the reference value for the network. We report b-values associated with sequences smaller than the average, likely corresponding to larger differential stresses than for the background seismicity of the area. For all the analysed sequences, we found that main events are anticipated by foreshocks, indicating a possible preparation process for main shocks at subkilometric scales.
2023
Earthquake detection; Machine learning; Seismic sequences; Statistical seismology; Time-series analysis;
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s10950-011-9232-0.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 1.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.96 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/27912
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact