We introduce a Bayesian algorithm designed to integrate earthquake magnitudes of the same type reported by various seismic networks, aiming to create unified and standardized catalogs suitable for widespread use. The fundamental concept underpinning this algorithm is the utilization of the inherent consistency within each individual network’s magnitude determination process. Assuming that the magnitudes for an earthquake measured by all networks conform to a Gaussian distribution, with a linear function of the unknown true magnitude serving as its mean, we derive the posterior probability distribution of the true magnitude under four different assumptions for the prior distribution: the uninformative uniform distribution, the unbounded Gutenberg–Richter (GR) magnitude–frequency law, the GR magnitude–frequency relationship restricted by the detection rate, and the truncated GR law as priors. We assess the robustness of the method by a test on several synthetic catalogs and then use it to merge the catalogs compiled by five seismic networks in Italy. The results demonstrate that our proposed magnitude‐merging algorithm effectively combines the catalogs, resulting in robust and unified data sets that are suitable for seismic hazard assessment and seismicity analysis.

A Bayesian Merging of Earthquake Magnitudes Determined by Multiple Seismic Networks

Gentili S.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

We introduce a Bayesian algorithm designed to integrate earthquake magnitudes of the same type reported by various seismic networks, aiming to create unified and standardized catalogs suitable for widespread use. The fundamental concept underpinning this algorithm is the utilization of the inherent consistency within each individual network’s magnitude determination process. Assuming that the magnitudes for an earthquake measured by all networks conform to a Gaussian distribution, with a linear function of the unknown true magnitude serving as its mean, we derive the posterior probability distribution of the true magnitude under four different assumptions for the prior distribution: the uninformative uniform distribution, the unbounded Gutenberg–Richter (GR) magnitude–frequency law, the GR magnitude–frequency relationship restricted by the detection rate, and the truncated GR law as priors. We assess the robustness of the method by a test on several synthetic catalogs and then use it to merge the catalogs compiled by five seismic networks in Italy. The results demonstrate that our proposed magnitude‐merging algorithm effectively combines the catalogs, resulting in robust and unified data sets that are suitable for seismic hazard assessment and seismicity analysis.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Si_et_al_2024.pdf

embargo fino al 02/07/2025

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 5.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/36003
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact