GOAT-CASE experiment aims to evaluate the expected improvement in automatic earthquake localisation in the joint area of NE Italy, Austria and Slovenia, performed by respective authoritative agencies, also members of AdriaArray experiment and virtual network CE3RN. We re-picked P-wave arrival onsets on the seismometer channels of permanent seismic stations, additional AdriaArray stations and additional permanent stations in the joint area plus the 50 km surrounding belt. The onset detections were performed by each member of the experiment for stations within its authoritative area while the detection association was performed centrally. The resulting catalogue was compared against the joint catalogue of manually revised locations as the reference. Only the location parameters were compared in this experiment while the magnitudes were taken from manual catalogues. We used Antelope software for analysis in a similar way as in regular real-time monitoring procedures but with commonly agreed parameters. The comparison of procedures and parameters used by the three agencies was also one of the goals of the experiment. After reviewing the results of the comparison for the first two years of the experiment for events with local magnitude M > 1.5 we conclude that there is observable improvement in earthquake locations. This is reflected by the median distance between automatic and manual locations with the GOAT-CASE result being better than the results of any of the individual agencies. Additionally, we discuss the installation of six temporary stations by OGS in sites already used by the previously successful AlpArray project.

GA-OGS-ARSO Transfrontier CE3RN AdriaArray Seismicity Experiment (GOAT-CASE) installations and first results

Pesaresi D.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

GOAT-CASE experiment aims to evaluate the expected improvement in automatic earthquake localisation in the joint area of NE Italy, Austria and Slovenia, performed by respective authoritative agencies, also members of AdriaArray experiment and virtual network CE3RN. We re-picked P-wave arrival onsets on the seismometer channels of permanent seismic stations, additional AdriaArray stations and additional permanent stations in the joint area plus the 50 km surrounding belt. The onset detections were performed by each member of the experiment for stations within its authoritative area while the detection association was performed centrally. The resulting catalogue was compared against the joint catalogue of manually revised locations as the reference. Only the location parameters were compared in this experiment while the magnitudes were taken from manual catalogues. We used Antelope software for analysis in a similar way as in regular real-time monitoring procedures but with commonly agreed parameters. The comparison of procedures and parameters used by the three agencies was also one of the goals of the experiment. After reviewing the results of the comparison for the first two years of the experiment for events with local magnitude M > 1.5 we conclude that there is observable improvement in earthquake locations. This is reflected by the median distance between automatic and manual locations with the GOAT-CASE result being better than the results of any of the individual agencies. Additionally, we discuss the installation of six temporary stations by OGS in sites already used by the previously successful AlpArray project.
2025
AdriaArray; Earthquake detection; Earthquake location; Seismic bulletin; Seismic network;
AdriaArray
Earthquake detection
Earthquake location
Seismic bulletin
Seismic network
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
68_5_DM564_Pesaresi_9300_INGV_AnnalsofGeophysicscorretto.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14083/48066
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact